FLAGLESS

Live by the law of love not by the lawlessness of violence and...

ryandaythompson — Sat, 05 May 2012 20:33:00 -0400

Live by the law of love not by the lawlessness of violence and aggression. Aggression, coercion, and violence are not Christian. Do not engage in them.

Taken from Tolstoy’s final letter to Mahatma Gandhi as found in Louis Fischer’s, “The Life of Mahatma Gandhi”.

"No nation is sovereign; they all operate on arbitrary, made-up boundaries, and the whimsy of..."

ryandaythompson — Sat, 10 Mar 2012 23:22:00 -0500

“

No nation is sovereign; they all operate on arbitrary, made-up boundaries, and the whimsy of self-granted power. There are no borders. Christ has all nations under him, he establishes and destroys governments as he sees fit, and the kingdom to come is not one of nations. It is a kingdom of people who are bound together by Christ’s sacrifice and resurrection. It is a kingdom that is already established, and that Christians are made citizens of the moment they are saved.

So, I no longer consent to participate in a necessarily immoral institution. I am a Christian, and have been instructed by the laws of my God and King to obey the laws of the land in which I am physically present so far as they do not conflict with obligations to my God. The Romans recognized that Christ’s commands were political in nature. They understood and fought Christianity tooth and nail until they gave up and just integrated Christianity as an approved State religion.

I am a Popular Christian, or as some call it a Christarchist. I am not bound by any State or Religion but my borders are cast by the shadow of the Cross of Christ. And my fellow Christians those borders are unbounded, limitless, and cross the whole of the Universe and more… our God is great.

”

- Aaron Huggins

Pray for the King!

ryandaythompson — Thu, 26 Jan 2012 11:49:00 -0500

So far, most Christians are convinced that Christian Anarchists are in rebellion because they don’t support the king. The thing that they neglect to realize is that I DO support the king. I support the king stopping his murder of Muslims, babies, dissenters, and many more. I support the king being reconciled to YHWH through the sacrifice of Jesus. They say, “Don’t denounce the king, pray for the king!” Allow me to point to the falseness of this dilemma and remind you that Paul was specifically telling Timothy to pray for the salvation of all peoples because YHWH wants all people to come to Himself through Jesus. This commits a fallacy of what I call “Implied Exclusion.” Praying for the king to be saved does not imply the exclusion of the prophetic work of denouncing corruption (or 3/4 of the Old Testament would be blank pages.)

So, allow me to politely note that I pray for the king constantly. Here is a prayer I wrote that sums up what I usually say about the king:

‘Heavenly Father,

I thank you that you are the almighty sovereign King of the universe. I thank you that you control all events on earth. I thank you that you are holy and just and that, as a result, I can have confidence that all things that happen, happen for a good and loving purpose regardless of whatever pain and suffering result. In this specific prayer, I pray for the individuals of the Senate, House, and Presidency. I pray for all of those involved in the bloodied, corrupted, murderous State you have ordianed (without questioning your holiness, sovereignty, justice, goodness, or love with which I have such intimate acquaintance.) Father, I pray that they will be saved, reconciled to you by the blood of your Son Jesus Christ, the Messiah, and, in being saved, have their eyes opened to the mass murder that they commit and injustice that they perpetuate every day. I pray that they would see that coercive action via legislation or “representation” is against Christianity and amounts to little more than a desecration of the temple of God that are individual humans created in Your image. I do not pray that they would “do their jobs well” or “wisely” since praying to you that someone would commit murder “well” is an abomination. I pray that they would leave office, denounce coercion and idolatrous electoral politics, denounce murder through war, denounce applying coercive temporal solutions to the moral issues of other people, proclaim the wonders of YHWH, proclaim salvation by grace alone, through faith alone, in Christ alone, and serve the One True King, King Jesus.

Amen’

Ryan Day Thompson

"We work for positive, peaceful change in the world and work to alleviate poverty, both tangible and..."

ryandaythompson — Sun, 08 Jan 2012 16:32:02 -0500

“We work for positive, peaceful change in the world and work to alleviate poverty, both tangible and spiritual, because that was and is the work of our Exemplar. Knowledge of divine sovereignty and eschatological finality does not shed responsibility to community action, in fact, it transforms community action into a dire imperative.”

I have a topic suggestion that I would be interested in you address, if you're up for it. Should we just ignore the government and live our lives following God's direction? Should we denounce bad government? Does it even matter?

ryandaythompson — Fri, 06 Jan 2012 12:11:00 -0500

Since we have endeavored to undertake a sizable project called, “Submission NOT Endorsement: A Christarchist Primer on Proof Texts”, that addresses your questions a text at a time and presents plausible solutions for Christians, I’ll go ahead and let this old question be answered like that and also give my brief take on it as well :-)

1) Yes. I think the most plausible way a Christian can keep their conscience clear in relation to the murderous state is to live like the state and its sub-organizations simply don’t exist. This means a number of things practically. For instance, I’m not completely ignoring the state by using this internet connection (since it is being paid for in FRN) or driving my car (using FRN again) or using our oven, or running our water, etc. Finding alternatives to these is challenging, and will be consuming much of my year this year! I think the answer is radical, but fairly straightforward: if we as Christians want a conscience clean of state involvement, we must have a total non-consent to every aspect of its doings.

2) I think that since the prophets spent a great portion of their time denouncing bad government, and taking after the example of guys like Daniel and Joseph and ladies like Esther who said, “This far and no further,” when “their” governments became idolatrous, adulterous, or murderous, we have more than enough reason to think that denouncing government is legitimate. Furthermore, our exemplar, Jesus Himself, was APPALLED at the turning of the temple into a center of Caesar and mammon worship (since it was Caesar’s face on those coins) and wasn’t precisely quiet about it. I think also if you read Paul considering Judahic and Roman context you’ll see very strong currents of criticism of the world spirit of the state.

3) Personally, I’ve begun to wonder if it’s worth it. If it even matters. I think that for some people, they would be better off just continuing what they’re doing and not bothering with the state. For others, I would have to say that this is worth it and that it matters very much. On a general Christian scale I would say it matters very much because the state is evil, to its core, in everything it does, and that, therefore, to not at least tertiarily consider our involvement in it flatly disobeys and ignores the gravitas behind Jesus command to love YHWH with all of our hearts, souls, and minds.

Ryan Day Thompson

A little out of the ordinary for us, but I think it fits :-)

ryandaythompson — Fri, 06 Jan 2012 00:18:16 -0500

A little out of the ordinary for us, but I think it fits :-)

Submission NOT Endorsement: A Christarchist Primer on Proof Texts

ryandaythompson — Wed, 28 Dec 2011 18:44:00 -0500

By Ryan Day Thompson

Note: I’m going to examine the following text in two palatable parts. It’s long, and my tendency is to the essay (unlike, say, David McElroy, who can pack a punch in less than a thousand words), so I think you’ll served better by short pieces. <tongueincheek> I know most of you will be reeling by the end of the first paragraph, so I want to make sure I don’t lose you ;-) </tongueincheek>

Consider this the first part of a very long FAQ. The name of the FAQ is “Submission NOT Endorsement,” because I am convinced from reading Scripture that the concept of submission from Paul is being horribly misinterpreted in relation to government. Somehow, in the Christian vocabulary, the words “submit,” “honor,” and, “pray” in the Christian vocabulary related to government have come to mean, “endorse this political candidate,” or, “sign this petition.” Jesus, Paul, Peter, and Titus don’t call us to endorsement, they call us to submission. And, based on a tertiary reading of Acts, I have my doubts that they mean submission in the way most Christians mean submission.

Happy Reading!

Matthew 22:15-21 | Taxation and the Christian

A Personal Note

I HATE taxation. I’m going to be forthright with you. My natural, perhaps fleshly, inclination is that taxation is theft. Think about it: you work hard, you deal with a boss or clients, you stress out, you earn a lot (or a little), you have bills to pay, you get your paycheck, and before you can even decide which over-priced necessity you’re going to use that check for, there’s the state with their hand out demanding your money. For what? The hard work YOU did? Or worse, you deal in goods that don’t even have anything to do with the FRN (Federal Reserve Note; a.k.a. dollar bill) and the state demands payment from you of some sort (like they have a right to portion of the milk from the cow that YOU raised.) It’s ridiculous. The atrocities they commit with that money are abominable. They kill children with that money. They laugh at our poverty while drinking champagne and eating caviar with that money while the homeless starve and the hard-working person like yourself barely has the ability to pay his bills and feed her children. They rescue financial criminals with that money. They pay corrupt judges who work in a corrupt and indecipherable system of arbitrary law to imprison innocent people who have engaged in victimless crimes with that money. They fight endless wars for which we have no money with that money. They pay warmongers in their blue-uniformed standing army to spray innocent people in the face with pepper spray and beat homeless men to death with that money. Every hour you work, 1/3 of your labor goes to immoral state programs. The state parasitically leeches from “its” people in the form of taxes.

I know, some of your hackles are raised (for what reason I cannot fathom), but let’s face it, if any other person took money from your wallet at the point of a gun, you would call the police. And that is exactly what the state does. If you don’t pay your taxes, they’ll show up at your door with a gun, kidnap you, and take you to prison. What gives them this right? It’s “legitimate” because they’re the government. Take off those blinders for just a moment and you will be appalled at this giant game of extortion, kidnap, and ransom.

And don’t even get me started about the “mercy” aspects for which taxes are taken. Anthony Gregory aptly sums up the supposed “good” aspects of state action afforded by taxation like this: “When the State offers you a hand up or a handout, notice the blood dripping from its fingers.” State handouts for medical or financial crises are just cleverly disguised games of bait and switch. You take their money; you belong to them. They own you for your sojourn on this earth.

This is my gut inclination. It is realistic. It calls a spade a spade. What the state is doing is a crime. It is anti-human. It is immoral. It is evil. It violates the basic principles of Genesis 1-6.

If you didn’t pay your taxes, I wouldn’t blame you. If you objected to the money that the state steals from you every day to kill children, I wouldn’t blame you. If you go protest, I won’t blame you. In fact, when the state takes the catastrophic fall it is about to take, I’ll probably write a song commemorating you when it’s all over. If we all stopped paying our taxes, the state would be drained and die rapidly.

However, if you decide to pay your taxes, I won’t blame you either. In fact, if you’re a Christian, I am going to encourage you to pay your taxes in full, and more. Let me explain, from Matthew 22:15-21, why I won’t object to you paying taxes (and I why I begrudgingly allow these tyrants to steal from me when I work in their corrupt system of centralized banking and use their rapidly-devalued dollar bill).

The Text In Question

‘Then the Pharisees went and plotted how to entangle him in his words. And they sent their disciples to him, along with the Herodians, saying, “Teacher, we know that you are true and teach the way of God truthfully, and you do not care about anyone’s opinion, for you are not swayed by appearances. Tell us, then, what you think. Is it lawful to pay taxes to Caesar, or not?” But Jesus, aware of their malice, said, “Why put me to the test, you hypocrites? Show me the coin for the tax.” And they brought him a denarius. And Jesus said to them, “Whose likeness and inscription is this?” They said, “Caesar’s.” Then he said to them, “Therefore render to Caesar the things that are Caesar’s, and to God the things that are God’s.” When they heard it, they marveled. And they left him and went away.’

The Interpretation of the Status Quo

Evangelical Fundamentalists or Theologically Liberal Protestants – the Fascist right-wing and Communist left-wing state’s greatest cheerleaders – interpret this text like this: Jesus is calling for us to pay our taxes, to submit to the state in all things, and to never call into question what any of that money is being used for, because then we wouldn’t be pursuing peace or, “praying for or honoring the king,” as Paul later tells us to do in Romans and in his letters to Timothy. The status quo demands that those who object to taxation SHUT UP, because this text tells them to pay their taxes and be done with it. I have to object to this banal and short-sighted interpretation by the status quo. Why? Not because I think it goes too far, but because I don’t think it goes nearly far enough.

An Attempted Interpretation

There’s something that really bothers me about the status quo’s interpretation: It is usually used by people who are mindlessly entwined in the system and totally misses the heart of the text. The heart of the text is not paying taxes, the heart of the text is giving to God what belongs to God. I would argue that this text cannot be used to argue against taxation but I don’t think that it can be used to argue for taxation, either. To take the text and use it as yet another proof for why we should be the greatest cheerleaders of the state is to blatantly disregard the meaning of Jesus’ injunction. Just what is happening here?

First, allow me to make some observations:

(1) The Pharisees want to find a way to kill or imprison Jesus. They’re fed up with him. They think that if they can trap him in his words to sound like a Pharisee (who despised Caesar’s face being imprinted on anything), they can claim him for their own and attempt to assimilate him into the greater thrust of their teaching; or, conversely, if they catch him saying it is lawful to pay Caesar, they themselves can discredit him for being anti-YHWH (because, again, the Pharisees were livid at the very thought of Caesar’s face being on anything.)

(2) Jesus doesn’t give them the satisfaction of categorizing him so easily, because he more or less says, “You’re right but you’re wrong.” The Pharisees, once again, are being “hypocrites.” How so? Well, in Jesus own words about the Pharisees elsewhere, they “clean the outside of the cup,” and remain “white-washed tombs.” How? They make this humongous fuss about Caesar’s face being on the coin as sinful, and then they worship their own image!

(3) Jesus basically says, “Does it really matter? Give God what belongs to God!”

(4) Allow me to note that nothing belongs to Caesar. That simple understanding should be your first tip-off that Jesus is probably not saying what the status quo is saying about this text. It would be odd for you, as a Christian, to argue that anything belongs to Caesar. Everything belongs to God.

(5) Nonetheless, Jesus argues that if it has Caesar’s face on it, it should be rendered to Caesar.

So, quick question, if a coin bears Caesar’s image, what bears God’s image? We do. Oh, sure, it may be marred and not look like in did in Genesis 1-2, but remnants of it are still there. We bear the image of God. Let me suggest that Jesus is not primarily advocating that we give Caesar 1/3 of our paychecks, Jesus is advocating that we give ourselves to God and that it really doesn’t matter what we give to Caesar as long as it’s whatever Caesar asks for that bears his image.

My question for you now comes from one of our contributors: Why aren’t you giving all of Caesar’s stuff back to him? Why do you insist on being wrapped up in Caesar’s idolatrous system? If Caesar wants his money back - coins that he has wrongfully and sinfully put his own face on - why do you insist on using a currency of idolatry? What makes you think you have a right to anything that bears Caesar’s image? Give it ALL back!

The long and the short of what Jesus is saying is that the Pharisees are asking the question all wrong. While they’re primarily frustrated with Caesar, they need to re-focus what they’re about. What are they to be about? Rendering themselves unto God.

So, you Christians who are urging me to pay my taxes for atrocities and tragedies, you Christians who demand that I play cheerleader for the state with my money, think very carefully before you use this text to support yourself, because Jesus isn’t saying what you’re saying.

Now, I know that the atheists are foaming at the mouth as they read this, and I don’t blame them at all. “No Gods!” Anarchists just need to take a deep breath and realize that what I am saying is not quite what it looks like I’m saying. My solutions to the problem of the seeming theft of taxation are NOT what you would generally hear from the Protestant status quo. On the other hand, the Christians are wondering what on earth happened to my furious stance on taxation. That is what the next part of this article will be about, and I encourage you to come back and see the solutions I present for the problem of taxation. I’ll give you a hint: if you look really closely at the words “likeness and inscription” and consider the overall thrust of this text to render oneself unto God alone, you will see where I am going economically and practically. You may like it, and you may not, but the solutions I’m about to present are good solutions, and they allow you to keep your conscience clear of having to be implicit in the atrocities of the state in taxation.

Check back next week.

[To Be Continued]

—————————

Ryan Day Thompson is a Christian, husband, father, photographer, Christarchist activist, and sometimes writer. He loves good conversations that take seriously real world issues. He hates trolling. If you want to contact him, email him at blogcon [at] gmail [dot] com. If you want to troll him, click here and then click here. Or, you can ask a question by clicking the “Have a Question?” button in the footer of this blog.

Why do American Christians impose their own political beliefs on God?

davidmcelroy — Mon, 07 Nov 2011 14:37:00 -0500

By David McElroy

Jesus wasn’t an American. He’s not a Democrat. He’s not a Republican. He’s not asking you to vote for a “pro-family agenda.” He’s also not calling you to elect politicians to achieve “social justice.” These things are news to some people.

There’s absolutely no reason to think God even wants you to vote. You’re lying to yourself and to others if you superimpose your own political views onto God — no matter what your beliefs are.

It’s been common throughout history for nations to claim that God was on their side, regardless of what they called God and regardless of what the rest of their theological beliefs were. Whatever “our side” did was favored by God — or the gods or Allah or whatever they called their deity. If you’re a Christian and you’re doing this today, you’re engaging in blasphemy, because you’re claiming to speak for God — and you’re just making things up and claiming they’re from Him.

I don’t have the exact quote anymore, but I once heard talk radio host Ian Punnett say that for many people, God is simply themselves with a deeper voice. Sadly, that’s true.

For Christians who hold conservative political positions, they somehow manage to come to the conclusion that God believes exactly what they do. What a relief. God wants a strong government to control people’s morality, but He also likes invading foreign countries that have those dirty people who talk funny and aren’t much like us. (He obviously didn’t really mean those things about loving enemies, so it’s safe to ignore those things as we cheer people being blown up and prisoners being tortured by the U.S. government.)

For Christians who hold progressive liberal positions, they somehow manage to come to the conclusion that God also believes exactly what they believe. Who would have thought? This saves them the trouble of having to think about any conflicts between their own political goals and what God wants of them. God wants a strong government which takes things from “greedy people” and gives things to poor people. Jesus talked about helping poor people, so He obviously wants us to force other people to obey what He said. Right?

When you worship God in these ways — and define Jesus in these terms — you’re creating your own god. Whoever that is who you have in your mind isn’t the Jesus of the Gospels. He’s your own creation — and that god seems an awful lot like you — just with a deeper voice.

If you call yourself a conservative, I challenge you to find a single example in the Gospels in which Jesus suggested the use of force to get anyone to obey Him. (Hint: You won’t find such an example.) Jesus isn’t calling for the FCC to stamp out obscenity or for police to arrest gay people or use force to stop people from making porn. Those are your positions, not His.

If you call yourself a progressive, I challenge you to find a single example in which Jesus suggested that His followers use force to ensure that other people obeyed the commands He gave to His own followers. (Hint: You won’t find any.) Jesus doesn’t “love the public option” or favor universal health care or whatever else you want to superimpose on Him. Those are your positions, not His.

You do understand that government is simply force, don’t you? Without force, the coercive state couldn’t function, because it would have to depend on people’s voluntary co-operation. And if people are to be allowed to do what they want (so long as they don’t violate other people’s rights or property), well, the state isn’t necessary in the first place.

If you’re a Christian, God has called you to live in certain ways and be certain things. He’s called us to help the poor and to quit worshipping our own pampered and luxurious lifestyles. (On this particular subject, I highly recommend a book by my own pastor challenging Christians to live a “Radical” lifestyle instead of the modern American materialist dream.) God has called us to be holy and moral people. But you won’t find one single example of Jesus suggesting that a government enforce the commands that He gave to His own followers. No, that’s the part that you and your friends (and your enemies) have added all on your own.

A friend told me this week that his own pastor recently said during a sermon that people who don’t vote are “almost sinning.” This pastor believes that not voting is somehow a violation of the command to love our neighbor. In other words, we are supposed to show we love some of our neighbors by having people use violence (or threat of violence and punishment) to arbitrarily steal money from other neighbors. That’s not following God. That’s simply finding ways to pretend that God supports what you wanted to do anyway.

God calls Christians to do certain things with their lives. He never calls us to force other people to obey His commands. If you’re using the name of God to justify using the coercive state to achieve what you want, you’re not serving God. You’re falsely speaking in His name and adding things to the Bible that just aren’t there.

Stick to what Jesus actually said. We have a long way to go before we’re living as He called us to live. Even if it were legitimate to force other people to live in accordance with Jesus’ teachings — which it isn’t — don’t we have a responsibility to live it first? We’re a long way from obeying Him ourselves.

Let’s quit trying to pretend that we’re qualified to give people orders in God’s name. We’re not qualified to do that and we never will be.

David McElroy writes about the coming post-statist world from a secret underground bunker protected by armed flying monkeys. You’ll find him at davidmcelroy.org.

An Update

ryandaythompson — Thu, 20 Oct 2011 12:37:00 -0400

(1) We’re a member site of Liberty Web Alliance now. They’re the group that brings you CopBlock.org and other valuable sites. You can see the introductory interview that r0thbard conducted with me here: Interview with r0thbard.

I’m excited to continue the expansion of network, not because I like feeling like I’m part of a collective mind (like that has any value as a dictator of truth claim) but because cognitive friendship is a valuable asset in a time when our general understanding of things is seriously questioned by 95% of our peers.

It makes me realize that, yes, this is worth continuing.

(2) We’re working through where we should go next. We’ve made the sweeping position statements (here, here, here, and here) that I think are necessary to make. We have some outstanding questions that I think we’ll spend some time answering over the next few weeks and we have the major pestering questions that Christians tend to hole up in and then refuse to listen to anything we say until we’ve answered them. Since those questions revolve mainly around proof texts I think that what we’re going to do is intermittently address the texts.

My pastor is working through 1st Peter right now and I know how he is going to interpret 1st Peter 2 when it comes around so that may be where I start. I have confidence that I’m going to receive more than a few in-my-face comments after that sermon so I’d like to have a prepared defense.

Anyway, if any of you follow us out there, that’s the plan. Enjoy.

Ryan Day Thompson, Contributor
The Flagless Cooperative

"Christians are under no obligation to obey a power that is illegitimate. Just because a man with a..."

ryandaythompson — Thu, 20 Oct 2011 12:03:04 -0400

“Christians are under no obligation to obey a power that is illegitimate. Just because a man with a gun orders us to do something does not mean that we should do it necessarily.”

- James Montgomery Boice

"I am weary of your quarrels, Weary of your wars and bloodshed, Weary of your prayers for..."

ryandaythompson — Mon, 10 Oct 2011 21:58:56 -0400

“I am weary of your quarrels,
Weary of your wars and bloodshed,
Weary of your prayers for vengeance,
Of your wranglings and dissensions;
All your strength is in your union,
All your danger is in discord;
Therefore be at peace henceforward,
And as brothers live together.”

- Henry Wadsworth Longfellow, The Song of Hiawatha

"Questions threaten the perception of the beneficial systems / A pyramid scheme with it’s cogs..."

ryandaythompson — Sat, 08 Oct 2011 16:51:53 -0400

“Questions threaten the perception of the beneficial systems / A pyramid scheme with it’s cogs and it’s pistons / Mechanization of men, making more and more / Live in a miserable existence / How can so few, claim so many victims / And this begs the question.”

- Josh Garrels

Ryan's Revolution Reading List

ryandaythompson — Fri, 07 Oct 2011 04:13:00 -0400

So I’ve had a reading list requested from me several times in the last few weeks. Any of you reading this who know me know that I read profusely and never make any decision without first consulting multiple sides of an argument in print. Of course, fewer and fewer of you who read me are people I know. Sooo…yeah. I read a lot.

Anyway, here are the books, articles, and musicians I recommend you read. If you care to read. Which you should. I have included links to various bookstores that carry these if you want physical media and links to ePubs and PDF’s if you don’t.

The Machinery of Freedom, David Friedman (DON’T END HERE. Friedman misses crucial aspects of the truly free market and his systems of privatization are not that good.) (Physical | PDF)
-
Man, Economy, and State, Murray Rothbard (This is an economics treatise. It is rough sledding and 1000+ pages. Like any book of this size, read the chapters that look interesting to you. You really will benefit from understand Austrian Business Cycle Theory though.)  (Physical | ePub | PDF)
-
Human Action, Ludwig Von Mises (If you like Ron Paul, you have to read this book. Paul goes nowhere without this tattered old tome. In fact, I would advocate that you can’t really be a Paul supporter in good conscience and not read this book.) (Physical | ePub | PDF)
-
No Treason: The Constitution of No Authority, Lysander Spooner (If you’re brainwashed into believing that the Constitution is somehow still an authoritative document, you need to read this.) (Physical | HTML)
-
For a New Liberty, Murray Rothbard (So you want practical? Here it is. The quintessential Libertarian tome!) (Physical | ePub | PDF)
-
Resist Not Evil!, Clarence Darrow (Sure, he defended Scopes. Get over it. People can be wrong about some things and spot on about others.) (Physical | ePub | PDF)
-
Advocates of Free Markets Should Embrace “Anti-Capitalism”, Gary Chartier (Necessary.) (PDF)  Also: Libertarian Anti-Capitalism, Charles Johnson (Again, necessary.) (HTML)
-
Agorist Class Theory, Wally Conger (I haven’t read this entirely, but what I have read is gold. Read it.) (PDF)
-
Anarchy as Order, David S. D’Amato (HTML)
-
The Myth of a Christian Nation, Gregory Boyd (So you think America was founded a Christian nation? Wrong!) (Physical)
-
Love & War & The Sea In Between, Josh Garrels (I have no idea where this guy falls politically but he appears to be the only “Christian” musician who even remotely understands my life. All the others are off with their heads stuck in the heavens and apparently have no idea how to apply the Biblical gospel to everyday life. That or they’re just out for money.) (Free Download)
-
Ending Tyranny without Violence, Murray Rothbard (HTML)
-
The Bible, God (This book is only last because most of you asking for my reading list already read it. However, I could babble about Rothbard and Mises forever and it would make no difference if they had nothing true to say. Here’s the deal: The Austrian/Voluntarist/Agorist/Anarchist scheme lines up squarely with Biblical truth when it comes to championing human rights and revealing and opposing the Satanic influence of the state. In a way, the Bible is the original resistance manual. Just go read Acts if you don’t believe me.)

So there it is. Ideas are found in books! Ideas change the world! Read, read, read!

Ryan Day Thompson, Contributor
Flagless: A Christian Anarchist Cooperative

"Don’t listen to the snake For he lies and he takes Your hope, your faith Away from you But..."

ryandaythompson — Thu, 06 Oct 2011 01:35:54 -0400

“Don’t listen to the snake
For he lies and he takes
Your hope, your faith
Away from you
But when the lion comes around
With his claw and his crown
Follow, follow
His every move”

- Josh Garrels

Thank you for your last post. For a while now I have been struggling with whether or not I was going to vote for Ron Paul. I agree with a lot of what he says, but I see now that it doesn't matter who wins. If Ron Paul wins the state might shrink, but ultimately a vote for a politician, no matter who they are is still a vote for the state. If we truly believe we should have no other Gods then we cannot support the state in any manner.

Tue, 04 Oct 2011 19:17:32 -0400

Well said, Murph! Ron Paul gets the Austro-Libertarian economic scheme better than any other politician and yet insists on using the ruined machinery of the state to try to…I’m really not sure what he is trying to do, to be honest. The good doctor’s talents would be better served going back to delivering babies (much like Thomas Jefferson retired to his farm after the Federalists flatly ignored him.)

He also insists on referring to the Constitution, a document that, by its very nature, allows the state to govern itself and thereby inflate at an extraordinary rate. (A “return to the Constitution” would do nothing because the Constitution is built with loopholes for the governmental monster to continue ruling in its own favor anyway, something that Rothbard aptly notes early on in For a New Liberty and Spooner notes in his treatise No Treason: The Constitution of No Authority. ”We the People,” nothing.)

I am glad you are coming to a similar conclusion concerning the nature of the state and the Christian’s relation to it. Any organization other than the Body of Christ that we respond as emotionally towards and defend as vehemently is clearly showing itself to be far too near to our hearts, as it is with any idol.

Act “in the Lord!” Serve the King!

Ryan Day Thompson, Contributor
The Flagless Cooperative

P.S. I’ll address your second question with an article. Actually, I think James and/or Tammie is writing on this very topic as we speak.

Has the American State Become Your Religion?

ryandaythompson — Tue, 04 Oct 2011 14:49:00 -0400

“You shall have no other gods before me.” (Ex. 20:3)

Before falsely using YHWH’s name, before the sabbath, before honor of father and mother, before murder, adultery, theft, or false witness or coveting, before all of these is this single command: “You shall have no other gods before me.” It is unqualified. Commentators have noted how the commands that follow this one command and every book that follows Exodus relate to it. Jesus summed up the two tables and their Deuteronomical and Levitical reiterations well. He said, “You shall love the Lord your God with all your heart and soul and mind and…you shall love your neighbor as yourself,” (Matt. 22:37-38). Throughout the Old and New Testaments the command is clear. When a king of Israel set up idols to Baal? He got sick and died or got killed in battle. When the Israelites themselves served Baal? The whole nation experienced strife and suffering. Israel was eventually conquered and destroyed for their idolatry. When Ananias and Sapphira worshiped their stuff rather than their creator? They died. Moses made it clear. The prophets made it clear. The Psalmists made it clear. Job made it clear. Jesus made it clear. Paul made it clear. There is no God but YHWH. You cannot serve YHWH and serve another god.

Whenever the followers of YHWH have ceased following Him, be it the church or Israel (if you choose to make that distinction,) and followed gods and systems who disdained human life, indulged in human sacrifice, and called for general immorality, the followers of YHWH have proven themselves not followers at all but, rather, idolaters who fall into many immoral pursuits. The writer of Hebrews said it well, “For who were those who heard and yet rebelled? Was it not all those who left Egypt led by Moses? And with whom was he provoked for forty years? Was it not with those who sinned, whose bodies fell in the wilderness? And to whom did he swear that they would not enter his rest, but to those who were disobedient? So we see that they were unable to enter because of unbelief,” (Heb. 3:16-19). This is one of those rare texts that connects disobedience closely with unbelief. Those people who called themselves follower of YHWH? They were no followers at all, they were unbelievers and they proved it with their actions of unfaithfulness to YHWH.

Imagine a god who calls for you to sacrifice your children! Imagine a god who calls for you to slaughter humans on his altar! Imagine a god who calls you to steal from your neighbor! Imagine a god who demands that you devote yourself to it and no other. “Baal!” you say. “Moloch!” you say. Why, yes, those gods did demand human sacrifice, theft, and pure devotion. They are gods of aggression. They are gods whose image we surely do not bear. They are not YHWH. They are not the true God. If you worship them you worship nothing and show yourself to be an unbeliever.

However, I am not talking about Baal or Moloch per se. I speak of the modern Baal.

Hear me out.

When you pay your taxes, the state takes that money and uses it to kill women and children both here and abroad in the protection of their own interests. When you put on a uniform and wield a weapon on behalf of the state to kill, you kill the son of another father and mother and a creature created in the image of God. When you vote, you perpetuate a system of democracy that is rooted in injustice (imagine using a majority of 51% to screw 49% out of their inherent right to something!) When you take millions of dollars from the state you swear your devotion to it for life. When you campaign for Rick Perry, or Ron Paul, or Michelle Bachmann, or Mitt Romney, or Barack Obama, or any human, you say, “This, I worship!” “The state?” you say? “HOW DARE YOU!?”

I am tracking a deeply disturbing trend: many Christians maddeningly refuse to hear “Christarchists” out when they decry the state’s protection of itself in war. Many Christians virtually stop their ears and gnash their teeth before they will hear us out when we decry the use of your taxes for abortion and the killing of the Muslim (while they somehow still “oppose” abortion and murder.) Many Christians refuse to hear us out when we decry the perpetuation of a system rooted in the injustice of the many oppressing the few. Many Christians refuse to hear us out when we question the validity of an institution that calls them to murder, steal, and inflict poverty wherever they go.

It is as if we were decrying the worship of YHWH! It is almost as if we used the very name of YHWH in vain! I, personally, have been sworn at, accused of being “inconsistent” with my worldview, and told that I am a disgrace to to the concept of freedom.

Why? Because I have chosen to live consistently with the Sermon on the Mount? Because I have attempted to live as consistently as possible with the system of non-aggression that the Bible predominantly espouses? Because I have expressed disdain for a Church that largely refuses to do its work and feed the poor? Because I have called for Voluntary consent to all taxes and systems of government (imagine a world in which we may voluntarily decide where we want our money and efforts to go! Is that not freedom?!) Because I have asked you to actually do what you say you’re doing and read Thomas Jefferson’s hatred of centralized government and banking? Because I have dared to point out that we in Evangelicalism and many Reformed circles are treating the Constitution as if it were God breathed?

Christians, the American state is the modern Baal! The voting booth is the modern “high place!” Politicians are the modern Asherim, the Constitution a modern Golden Calf, partisan politics the modern Marduk. As Moloch asked the Israelites to sacrifice their children on his altars, the state demands that we fund its murder of children. As Asher demanded immorality on her altars, the state demands at the point of a gun that we fund every immorality which we supposedly oppose. As Nebuchadnezzar built a giant image of himself and demanded Daniel worship it, the state presents politicians of all colors who build an image of themselves through various media and demand that we worship them with our vote and consent (and, subsequently, our money, time, and lives.)

I am seriously uncomfortable in my church now. Why? Every time I look at my pastor (who preaches amazing, Biblical, Christ-centered sermons) I see the American flag directly behind him. That’s right, the symbol of the modern Baal, proudly displayed for all to see and hear that we condone the murder of children, that we love war, that we adore theft! That flag speaks so loudly I cannot hear my pastor anymore. We may as well have a Pentagram on the wall! Let us display the Asherim! Let us build a high place! Let us mold a golden calf and dance around it! Let us bow down and worship Tiamat! If we’re going to go this far we may as well “go the whole hog!”

Christians, the American state is dangerously close to being our religion if it is not already. It is becoming hard to distinguish between the two for me. Do we serve Baal, or do we serve YHWH? Choose, and choose quickly, because this state is about to demand your total and complete worship.

If we bow down, we prove our unbelief. YHWH and YHWH alone is God. If we dance around this golden calf, we prove that we do not ultimately believe that Christ is the one and all-sufficient King.

Do we serve YHWH, or do we serve Herman Cain? Do we serve YHWH or do we serve the Republican party? Do we serve YHWH, or do we serve the American state? Has the American state become our religion?

We worship in vain before blocks of wood and dead pillars of stone wrought by the hands of men if we continue to serve America, the modern Baal.

There is no King but Christ! Let us serve the King!

Ryan Day Thompson, Contributor
The Flagless Cooperative

"Christian men and women must confront all life’s issues and make all life’s decisions..."

ryandaythompson — Mon, 03 Oct 2011 12:40:13 -0400

“Christian men and women must confront all life’s issues and make all life’s decisions “in the Lord.” This means that to be truly and dynamically Christian, a person must be possessed by Christ in such a way as to be an instrument of his will. To act “in the Lord” is to recognize that personal commitment to Christ is such that he must become the source, the pattern, the inspiration of all living. Out of love and reverence for Christ and imbued with the spirit of “caring” for man in every dimension of his being, which Christ inspires, his followers are called upon to live their lives in the light, love, and power of Christ. Taking advantage of all available knowledge, conducting themselves as responsible citizens, sensitive to the concrete situation in which the find themselves, Christians must decide and act “in the Lord.” Should the action they take arouse the ire of the government or of fellow citizens and fellow churchmen, or should it prove to be disadvantageous to their personal interests, let them resignedly accept the consequences in loyalty to their consciences.”

- John A. MacKay

"How do good men become a part of the regime? They don’t believe in resistance."

ryandaythompson — Sat, 01 Oct 2011 19:14:46 -0400

“How do good men become a part of the regime? They don’t believe in resistance.”

- Josh Garrels

In Order

ryandaythompson — Fri, 30 Sep 2011 17:08:22 -0400

Tammie Libertas posted an excellent series of articles recently. They are read in the following order:

Logic and the Foundation of the Non-Aggression Axiom - Part 1a, Part 1b, Part 1c

In case you’re just dropping by for the first time or would like a refresh on what we’re about you can refer to the following articles:

Our Contributors

Flagless: An Introductory Post

In the next couple of weeks we’ll have some new posts for you and I’m sure some interesting quotes. I, personally, am considering a photographic illustration of hyperinflation. The point of being a cooperative is that we can each pick up when the other’s busy lives make consistent posting impossible. Since we all have jobs and families this has been working out great.

Drop by once a week or so to keep an eye on us. Or just put us in your feed-reader!

We also really appreciate questions. Feel free to scroll all the way down to the very bottom of this page where a nav-bar appears and click, “Have a Question?” to ask away!

Ryan Thompson, Contributor
The Flagless Cooperative

Logic and the foundation of the non-aggression axiom (Part 1c - Conclusion)

captainlibertas — Tue, 27 Sep 2011 15:09:00 -0400

(This blog begins to pose questions about the role of a Christian – if any – in civil government. I will further develop these questions in a later blog. For now I will only begin to bring in some superficial concerns)

“Our love to God is measured by our everyday fellowship with others and the love it displays.” - Andrew Murray

“If individuals live only seventy years, then a state, or a nation, or a civilization, which may last for a thousand years, is more important than an individual. But if Christianity is true, then the individual is not only more important, but incomparably more important, for he is everlasting and the life of a state or civilization, compared with his, is only a moment.” – C.S. Lewis

Part 1c

The God of Holy Scripture is the ultimate omniscient, omnipotent, and omnipresent judge needed for justice to exist (see part 1b); the One whom Kant determined must exist in order for the idea of justice to have meaning. Some might want to debate if the Christian God is the correct standard and this does make for an interesting discussion. Yet for the sake of space it will have to be addressed in a different blog. For now I will continue by working under the knowledge that the character of the God revealed through the Bible makes Him a logical basis for ultimate moral standards such as the non-aggression axiom.

As Christians we have a foundation for believing there is a supreme moral law and that an unchanging Holy God shared this standard to His people. Communicating through Moses, the ultimate moral law was passed down in the form of the Ten Commandments (Exodus, Chapter 20). Coercive governments (aka, modern idea of the state) violate not only non-aggression principle, but more importantly – for the believer – they violate God’s commandments as well. But, how is this so? Precisely how does the modern state break or abuse the commandments of God? The last 6 of the commandments speak specifically as to how we are to treat our fellow man – all of whom were created by and in the image of God (Genesis 1:26-27, Job 33:4, Psalm 119:73, Psalm 139:13-16: Isaiah 44:2, et al). Let’s take a closer look at two of the commandments: numbers 6 and 8.

Commandment 8 states: “You shall not steal” (Exodus 20:15) However it must be acknowledged that through both taxation and inflation the government of the United States steals from its citizenry. Through fear and coercion a portion of all earned/spent monies are pilfered by the civil government. Some will argue that as citizens we are bound to provide funds to our civil government, therefore it is not stealing. But are we, those who did not assent to the words contained in the constitution of the United States, bound to obey such demands? As Lysander Spooner eloquently stated, “If, then, those who established the Constitution, had no power to bind … their posterity, the question arises, whether their posterity have bound themselves?” Others might suggest that Christians are bound to support the civil government. Christian, ask yourself this: if the civil government is behaving immorally by violating the commandments of God – such as using coerced tax dollars in order to initiate force against innocents, or to commit acts of mass murder,– are you justified in actively participating in it?

Stating, “Thou shall not kill,” the 6th commandment is a prohibition against unwarranted killing (Exodus 20:13). Nevertheless, all civil governments have historically participated in wars which were not supportable under the theory of just self-defense. The question the Christian needs to consider is how actively participating in the state makes him culpable for those unjust acts of aggression. Does involvement in the coercive state make one culpable for the moral crimes perpetrated by it? In his classic work, “The Instititues,” John Calvin asserts that while restrictions are pointed out in the commandments, positive action is also required. The believer should not only stand against murder, but do all they can to protect life. Ask yourself if this can be done while turning a blind eye to the actions carried out by an imperialistic state.

Furthermore, in the New Testament Christ taught us that He came to fulfill the Law, not to destroy it. As recorded in Matthew 22:37, “Jesus said unto him, ‘Thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thy heart, and with all thy soul, and with all thy mind. This is the first and great commandment. And the second is like unto it, Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself.’” Also, in Romans 13:8, Christians are told to, “to love one another: for he that loveth another hath fulfilled the law.” Force, violence, and emotional manipulation are not actions of a loving people – are not actions of the Christian. Additionally, Christ has told us that His kingdom is not of this world (John 18:36). Christian, we are citizens of the kingdom of Christ and are strangers in this world (Genesis 23:3-4), here to be His ambassadors (2 Corinthians 5:20) – bringing Him glory. Consider if enthusiastically endorsing a compulsory (and violent) government can accomplish this. Moreover, help your older children not only ask themselves these questions, but logically come to conclusions. They should understand what God requires of His covenant people.

Allowing our kids to question our beliefs – both political and religious – can be a frightening thing. Yet, embrace it! The internal struggle between “what ought to be” and “what is,” is a great springboard for the discussion about the philosophy of ethics. Learn alongside of them. Pick up a book on introductory logic and work it with them. Harness their natural curiousity and give them the tools they need to become a thinking people. Show them that the natural should’s and ought’s written in their conscience have a base in the ultimate standards of God’s Law.

Recommended book lists for parents and children

Introductory Logic http://www.amazon.com/Introductory-Logic-James-B-Nance/dp/1591280338/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1316809337&sr=1-1)
Intermediate Logic http://www.amazon.com/Intermediate-Logic-James-B-Nance/dp/1591280354/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1316809380&sr=1-1
Material Logic http://www.amazon.com/Material-Logic-Traditional-Approach-Thinking/dp/1930953577/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1316809531&sr=1-1
Gordon Clark’s books http://www.amazon.com/Gordon-Haddon-Clark/e/B001K7XOAK/ref=sr_ntt_srch_lnk_1?qid=1316809472&sr=1-1
Cornelius Van Til’s books http://www.amazon.com/Cornelius-Van-Til/e/B001JS7F00/ref=sr_ntt_srch_lnk_1?qid=1316809446&sr=1-1
Mere Christianity http://www.amazon.com/Mere-Christianity-C-S-Lewis/dp/0060652888/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1316809301&sr=8-1
Greg Bahnsen’s books http://www.amazon.com/Greg-L.-Bahnsen/e/B001KCWMKI/ref=sr_ntt_srch_lnk_2?qid=1316809420&sr=1-2
.