Showing posts tagged anarchy

"

No nation is sovereign; they all operate on arbitrary, made-up boundaries, and the whimsy of self-granted power. There are no borders. Christ has all nations under him, he establishes and destroys governments as he sees fit, and the kingdom to come is not one of nations. It is a kingdom of people who are bound together by Christ’s sacrifice and resurrection. It is a kingdom that is already established, and that Christians are made citizens of the moment they are saved.

So, I no longer consent to participate in a necessarily immoral institution. I am a Christian, and have been instructed by the laws of my God and King to obey the laws of the land in which I am physically present so far as they do not conflict with obligations to my God. The Romans recognized that Christ’s commands were political in nature. They understood and fought Christianity tooth and nail until they gave up and just integrated Christianity as an approved State religion.

I am a Popular Christian, or as some call it a Christarchist. I am not bound by any State or Religion but my borders are cast by the shadow of the Cross of Christ. And my fellow Christians those borders are unbounded, limitless, and cross the whole of the Universe and more… our God is great.

"

— Aaron Huggins

(Source: http)

I have a topic suggestion that I would be interested in you address, if you're up for it. Should we just ignore the government and live our lives following God's direction? Should we denounce bad government? Does it even matter?

Since we have endeavored to undertake a sizable project called, “Submission NOT Endorsement: A Christarchist Primer on Proof Texts”, that addresses your questions a text at a time and presents plausible solutions for Christians, I’ll go ahead and let this old question be answered like that and also give my brief take on it as well :-)

1) Yes. I think the most plausible way a Christian can keep their conscience clear in relation to the murderous state is to live like the state and its sub-organizations simply don’t exist. This means a number of things practically. For instance, I’m not completely ignoring the state by using this internet connection (since it is being paid for in FRN) or driving my car (using FRN again) or using our oven, or running our water, etc. Finding alternatives to these is challenging, and will be consuming much of my year this year! I think the answer is radical, but fairly straightforward: if we as Christians want a conscience clean of state involvement, we must have a total non-consent to every aspect of its doings.

2) I think that since the prophets spent a great portion of their time denouncing bad government, and taking after the example of guys like Daniel and Joseph and ladies like Esther who said, “This far and no further,” when “their” governments became idolatrous, adulterous, or murderous, we have more than enough reason to think that denouncing government is legitimate. Furthermore, our exemplar, Jesus Himself, was APPALLED at the turning of the temple into a center of Caesar and mammon worship (since it was Caesar’s face on those coins) and wasn’t precisely quiet about it. I think also if you read Paul considering Judahic and Roman context you’ll see very strong currents of criticism of the world spirit of the state.

3) Personally, I’ve begun to wonder if it’s worth it. If it even matters. I think that for some people, they would be better off just continuing what they’re doing and not bothering with the state. For others, I would have to say that this is worth it and that it matters very much. On a general Christian scale I would say it matters very much because the state is evil, to its core, in everything it does, and that, therefore, to not at least tertiarily consider our involvement in it flatly disobeys and ignores the gravitas behind Jesus command to love YHWH with all of our hearts, souls, and minds.

Ryan Day Thompson

"Christians are under no obligation to obey a power that is illegitimate. Just because a man with a gun orders us to do something does not mean that we should do it necessarily."

— James Montgomery Boice

"Questions threaten the perception of the beneficial systems / A pyramid scheme with it’s cogs and it’s pistons / Mechanization of men, making more and more / Live in a miserable existence / How can so few, claim so many victims / And this begs the question."

— Josh Garrels

Ryan’s Revolution Reading List

So I’ve had a reading list requested from me several times in the last few weeks.  Any of you reading this who know me know that I read profusely and never make any decision without first consulting multiple sides of an argument in print.  Of course, fewer and fewer of you who read me are people I know.  Sooo…yeah.  I read a lot.

Anyway, here are the books, articles, and musicians I recommend you read.  If you care to read.  Which you should.  I have included links to various bookstores that carry these if you want physical media and links to ePubs and PDF’s if you don’t.

  • The Machinery of Freedom, David Friedman (DON’T END HERE.  Friedman misses crucial aspects of the truly free market and his systems of privatization are not that good.)  (Physical | PDF)
    -
  • Man, Economy, and State, Murray Rothbard (This is an economics treatise.  It is rough sledding and 1000+ pages.  Like any book of this size, read the chapters that look interesting to you.  You really will benefit from understand Austrian Business Cycle Theory though.)
  (Physical | ePub | PDF)
    -
  • Human Action, Ludwig Von Mises (If you like Ron Paul, you have to read this book.  Paul goes nowhere without this tattered old tome.  In fact, I would advocate that you can’t really be a Paul supporter in good conscience and not read this book.) (Physical | ePub | PDF)
    -
  • No Treason: The Constitution of No Authority, Lysander Spooner (If you’re brainwashed into believing that the Constitution is somehow still an authoritative document, you need to read this.) (Physical | HTML)
    -
  • For a New Liberty, Murray Rothbard (So you want practical?  Here it is.  The quintessential Libertarian tome!) (Physical | ePub | PDF)
    -
  • Resist Not Evil!, Clarence Darrow (Sure, he defended Scopes.  Get over it.  People can be wrong about some things and spot on about others.) (Physical | ePub | PDF)
    -
  • Advocates of Free Markets Should Embrace “Anti-Capitalism”, Gary Chartier (Necessary.) (PDF)
  Also:  Libertarian Anti-Capitalism, Charles Johnson (Again, necessary.) (HTML)
    -
  • Agorist Class Theory, Wally Conger (I haven’t read this entirely, but what I have read is gold.  Read it.) (PDF)
    -
  • Anarchy as Order, David S. D’Amato (HTML)
    -
  • The Myth of a Christian Nation, Gregory Boyd (So you think America was founded a Christian nation?  Wrong!) (Physical)
    -
  • Love & War & The Sea In Between, Josh Garrels (I have no idea where this guy falls politically but he appears to be the only “Christian” musician who even remotely understands my life.  All the others are off with their heads stuck in the heavens and apparently have no idea how to apply the Biblical gospel to everyday life.  That or they’re just out for money.) (Free Download)
    -
  • Ending Tyranny without Violence, Murray Rothbard (HTML)
    -
  • The Bible, God (This book is only last because most of you asking for my reading list already read it.  However, I could babble about Rothbard and Mises forever and it would make no difference if they had nothing true to say.  Here’s the deal:  The Austrian/Voluntarist/Agorist/Anarchist scheme lines up squarely with Biblical truth when it comes to championing human rights and revealing and opposing the Satanic influence of the state.  In a way, the Bible is the original resistance manual.  Just go read Acts if you don’t believe me.)

So there it is.  Ideas are found in books!  Ideas change the world!  Read, read, read!

Ryan Day Thompson, Contributor
Flagless: A Christian Anarchist Cooperative

"Don’t listen to the snake
For he lies and he takes
Your hope, your faith
Away from you
But when the lion comes around
With his claw and his crown
Follow, follow
His every move"

— Josh Garrels

Has the American State Become Your Religion?

“You shall have no other gods before me.” (Ex. 20:3)

Before falsely using YHWH’s name, before the sabbath, before honor of father and mother, before murder, adultery, theft, or false witness or coveting, before all of these is this single command: “You shall have no other gods before me.”  It is unqualified.  Commentators have noted how the commands that follow this one command and every book that follows Exodus relate to it.  Jesus summed up the two tables and their Deuteronomical and Levitical reiterations well.  He said, “You shall love the Lord your God with all your heart and soul and mind and…you shall love your neighbor as yourself,” (Matt. 22:37-38).  Throughout the Old and New Testaments the command is clear.  When a king of Israel set up idols to Baal?  He got sick and died or got killed in battle.  When the Israelites themselves served Baal?  The whole nation experienced strife and suffering.  Israel was eventually conquered and destroyed for their idolatry.  When Ananias and Sapphira worshiped their stuff rather than their creator?  They died.  Moses made it clear.  The prophets made it clear.  The Psalmists made it clear.  Job made it clear.  Jesus made it clear.  Paul made it clear.  There is no God but YHWH.  You cannot serve YHWH and serve another god.

Whenever the followers of YHWH have ceased following Him, be it the church or Israel (if you choose to make that distinction,) and followed gods and systems who disdained human life, indulged in human sacrifice, and called for general immorality, the followers of YHWH have proven themselves not followers at all but, rather, idolaters who fall into many immoral pursuits.  The writer of Hebrews said it well, “For who were those who heard and yet rebelled? Was it not all those who left Egypt led by Moses? And with whom was he provoked for forty years? Was it not with those who sinned, whose bodies fell in the wilderness? And to whom did he swear that they would not enter his rest, but to those who were disobedient? So we see that they were unable to enter because of unbelief,” (Heb. 3:16-19).  This is one of those rare texts that connects disobedience closely with unbelief.  Those people who called themselves follower of YHWH?  They were no followers at all, they were unbelievers and they proved it with their actions of unfaithfulness to YHWH.

Imagine a god who calls for you to sacrifice your children!  Imagine a god who calls for you to slaughter humans on his altar!  Imagine a god who calls you to steal from your neighbor!  Imagine a god who demands that you devote yourself to it and no other.  “Baal!” you say.  “Moloch!” you say.  Why, yes, those gods did demand human sacrifice, theft, and pure devotion.  They are gods of aggression.  They are gods whose image we surely do not bear.  They are not YHWH.  They are not the true God.  If you worship them you worship nothing and show yourself to be an unbeliever.

However, I am not talking about Baal or Moloch per se.  I speak of the modern Baal.

Hear me out.

When you pay your taxes, the state takes that money and uses it to kill women and children both here and abroad in the protection of their own interests.  When you put on a uniform and wield a weapon on behalf of the state to kill, you kill the son of another father and mother and a creature created in the image of God.  When you vote, you perpetuate a system of democracy that is rooted in injustice (imagine using a majority of 51% to screw 49% out of their inherent right to something!)  When you take millions of dollars from the state you swear your devotion to it for life.  When you campaign for Rick Perry, or Ron Paul, or Michelle Bachmann, or Mitt Romney, or Barack Obama, or any human, you say, “This, I worship!”  “The state?” you say?  “HOW DARE YOU!?”

I am tracking a deeply disturbing trend: many Christians maddeningly refuse to hear “Christarchists” out when they decry the state’s protection of itself in war.  Many Christians virtually stop their ears and gnash their teeth before they will hear us out when we decry the use of your taxes for abortion and the killing of the Muslim (while they somehow still “oppose” abortion and murder.)  Many Christians refuse to hear us out when we decry the perpetuation of a system rooted in the injustice of the many oppressing the few.  Many Christians refuse to hear us out when we question the validity of an institution that calls them to murder, steal, and inflict poverty wherever they go.

It is as if we were decrying the worship of YHWH!  It is almost as if we used the very name of YHWH in vain!  I, personally, have been sworn at, accused of being “inconsistent” with my worldview, and told that I am a disgrace to to the concept of freedom.

Why?  Because I have chosen to live consistently with the Sermon on the Mount?  Because I have attempted to live as consistently as possible with the system of non-aggression that the Bible predominantly espouses?  Because I have expressed disdain for a Church that largely refuses to do its work and feed the poor?  Because I have called for Voluntary consent to all taxes and systems of government (imagine a world in which we may voluntarily decide where we want our money and efforts to go!  Is that not freedom?!)  Because I have asked you to actually do what you say you’re doing and read Thomas Jefferson’s hatred of centralized government and banking?  Because I have dared to point out that we in Evangelicalism and many Reformed circles are treating the Constitution as if it were God breathed?

Christians, the American state is the modern Baal!  The voting booth is the modern “high place!”  Politicians are the modern Asherim, the Constitution a modern Golden Calf, partisan politics the modern Marduk.  As Moloch asked the Israelites to sacrifice their children on his altars, the state demands that we fund its murder of children.  As Asher demanded immorality on her altars, the state demands at the point of a gun that we fund every immorality which we supposedly oppose.  As Nebuchadnezzar built a giant image of himself and demanded Daniel worship it, the state presents politicians of all colors who build an image of themselves through various media and demand that we worship them with our vote and consent (and, subsequently, our money, time, and lives.)

I am seriously uncomfortable in my church now.  Why?  Every time I look at my pastor (who preaches amazing, Biblical, Christ-centered sermons) I see the American flag directly behind him.  That’s right, the symbol of the modern Baal, proudly displayed for all to see and hear that we condone the murder of children, that we love war, that we adore theft!  That flag speaks so loudly I cannot hear my pastor anymore.  We may as well have a Pentagram on the wall!  Let us display the Asherim!  Let us build a high place!  Let us mold a golden calf and dance around it!  Let us bow down and worship Tiamat!  If we’re going to go this far we may as well “go the whole hog!”

Christians, the American state is dangerously close to being our religion if it is not already.  It is becoming hard to distinguish between the two for me.  Do we serve Baal, or do we serve YHWH?  Choose, and choose quickly, because this state is about to demand your total and complete worship.

If we bow down, we prove our unbelief.   YHWH and YHWH alone is God.  If we dance around this golden calf, we prove that we do not ultimately believe that Christ is the one and all-sufficient King. 

Do we serve YHWH, or do we serve Herman Cain?  Do we serve YHWH or do we serve the Republican party?  Do we serve YHWH, or do we serve the American state?  Has the American state become our religion?

We worship in vain before blocks of wood and dead pillars of stone wrought by the hands of men if we continue to serve America, the modern Baal.

There is no King but Christ!  Let us serve the King!

Ryan Day Thompson, Contributor
The Flagless Cooperative

"Christian men and women must confront all life’s issues and make all life’s decisions “in the Lord.” This means that to be truly and dynamically Christian, a person must be possessed by Christ in such a way as to be an instrument of his will. To act “in the Lord” is to recognize that personal commitment to Christ is such that he must become the source, the pattern, the inspiration of all living. Out of love and reverence for Christ and imbued with the spirit of “caring” for man in every dimension of his being, which Christ inspires, his followers are called upon to live their lives in the light, love, and power of Christ. Taking advantage of all available knowledge, conducting themselves as responsible citizens, sensitive to the concrete situation in which the find themselves, Christians must decide and act “in the Lord.” Should the action they take arouse the ire of the government or of fellow citizens and fellow churchmen, or should it prove to be disadvantageous to their personal interests, let them resignedly accept the consequences in loyalty to their consciences."

— John A. MacKay

"How do good men become a part of the regime? They don’t believe in resistance."

— Josh Garrels

Logic and the foundation of the non-aggression axiom (Part 1c - Conclusion)

(This blog begins to pose questions about the role of a Christian – if any – in civil government. I will further develop these questions in a later blog. For now I will only begin to bring in some superficial concerns)

“Our love to God is measured by our everyday fellowship with others and the love it displays.” - Andrew Murray


“If individuals live only seventy years, then a state, or a nation, or a civilization, which may last for a thousand years, is more important than an individual. But if Christianity is true, then the individual is not only more important, but incomparably more important, for he is everlasting and the life of a state or civilization, compared with his, is only a moment.” – C.S. Lewis

Part 1c

The God of Holy Scripture is the ultimate omniscient, omnipotent, and omnipresent judge needed for justice to exist (see part 1b); the One whom Kant determined must exist in order for the idea of justice to have meaning. Some might want to debate if the Christian God is the correct standard and this does make for an interesting discussion. Yet for the sake of space it will have to be addressed in a different blog. For now I will continue by working under the knowledge that the character of the God revealed through the Bible makes Him a logical basis for ultimate moral standards such as the non-aggression axiom.

As Christians we have a foundation for believing there is a supreme moral law and that an unchanging Holy God shared this standard to His people. Communicating through Moses, the ultimate moral law was passed down in the form of the Ten Commandments (Exodus, Chapter 20). Coercive governments (aka, modern idea of the state) violate not only non-aggression principle, but more importantly – for the believer – they violate God’s commandments as well. But, how is this so? Precisely how does the modern state break or abuse the commandments of God? The last 6 of the commandments speak specifically as to how we are to treat our fellow man – all of whom were created by and in the image of God (Genesis 1:26-27, Job 33:4, Psalm 119:73, Psalm 139:13-16: Isaiah 44:2, et al). Let’s take a closer look at two of the commandments: numbers 6 and 8.

Commandment 8 states: “You shall not steal” (Exodus 20:15) However it must be acknowledged that through both taxation and inflation the government of the United States steals from its citizenry. Through fear and coercion a portion of all earned/spent monies are pilfered by the civil government. Some will argue that as citizens we are bound to provide funds to our civil government, therefore it is not stealing. But are we, those who did not assent to the words contained in the constitution of the United States, bound to obey such demands? As Lysander Spooner eloquently stated, “If, then, those who established the Constitution, had no power to bind … their posterity, the question arises, whether their posterity have bound themselves?” Others might suggest that Christians are bound to support the civil government. Christian, ask yourself this: if the civil government is behaving immorally by violating the commandments of God – such as using coerced tax dollars in order to initiate force against innocents, or to commit acts of mass murder,– are you justified in actively participating in it?

Stating, “Thou shall not kill,” the 6th commandment is a prohibition against unwarranted killing (Exodus 20:13). Nevertheless, all civil governments have historically participated in wars which were not supportable under the theory of just self-defense. The question the Christian needs to consider is how actively participating in the state makes him culpable for those unjust acts of aggression. Does involvement in the coercive state make one culpable for the moral crimes perpetrated by it? In his classic work, “The Instititues,” John Calvin asserts that while restrictions are pointed out in the commandments, positive action is also required. The believer should not only stand against murder, but do all they can to protect life. Ask yourself if this can be done while turning a blind eye to the actions carried out by an imperialistic state.

Furthermore, in the New Testament Christ taught us that He came to fulfill the Law, not to destroy it. As recorded in Matthew 22:37, “Jesus said unto him, ‘Thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thy heart, and with all thy soul, and with all thy mind. This is the first and great commandment. And the second is like unto it, Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself.’” Also, in Romans 13:8, Christians are told to, “to love one another: for he that loveth another hath fulfilled the law.” Force, violence, and emotional manipulation are not actions of a loving people – are not actions of the Christian. Additionally, Christ has told us that His kingdom is not of this world (John 18:36). Christian, we are citizens of the kingdom of Christ and are strangers in this world (Genesis 23:3-4), here to be His ambassadors (2 Corinthians 5:20) – bringing Him glory. Consider if enthusiastically endorsing a compulsory (and violent) government can accomplish this. Moreover, help your older children not only ask themselves these questions, but logically come to conclusions. They should understand what God requires of His covenant people.

Allowing our kids to question our beliefs – both political and religious – can be a frightening thing. Yet, embrace it! The internal struggle between “what ought to be” and “what is,” is a great springboard for the discussion about the philosophy of ethics. Learn alongside of them. Pick up a book on introductory logic and work it with them. Harness their natural curiousity and give them the tools they need to become a thinking people. Show them that the natural should’s and ought’s written in their conscience have a base in the ultimate standards of God’s Law.

Recommended book lists for parents and children

Introductory Logic http://www.amazon.com/Introductory-Logic-James-B-Nance/dp/1591280338/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1316809337&sr=1-1)
Intermediate Logic http://www.amazon.com/Intermediate-Logic-James-B-Nance/dp/1591280354/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1316809380&sr=1-1
Material Logic http://www.amazon.com/Material-Logic-Traditional-Approach-Thinking/dp/1930953577/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1316809531&sr=1-1
Gordon Clark’s books http://www.amazon.com/Gordon-Haddon-Clark/e/B001K7XOAK/ref=sr_ntt_srch_lnk_1?qid=1316809472&sr=1-1
Cornelius Van Til’s books http://www.amazon.com/Cornelius-Van-Til/e/B001JS7F00/ref=sr_ntt_srch_lnk_1?qid=1316809446&sr=1-1
Mere Christianity http://www.amazon.com/Mere-Christianity-C-S-Lewis/dp/0060652888/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1316809301&sr=8-1
Greg Bahnsen’s books http://www.amazon.com/Greg-L.-Bahnsen/e/B001KCWMKI/ref=sr_ntt_srch_lnk_2?qid=1316809420&sr=1-2
.

About me

We are a group of Christians dedicated to the gospel of Jesus Christ as set out by Jesus, the Apostles, the early church and then defended by Augustine, many medieval Christians, Luther, Calvin, Edwards and the Puritans, some of the Fundamentalists, and many modern Reformed and Evangelical people. The odd part? We are also convinced, both from political theory and from the Bible, that Anarchy is that which will bring a semblance of order to earthly society. We do not believe that the state works or that it is Biblical and, as such, we tout freedom from state. We have but one king and that is Christ.

Have a Question? Ask here!